Still, even the slowest dedicated GPU we might consider recommending ends up being far better than integrated graphics. We've used generally high-end parts, including better-than-average memory and storage, but the systems are not (and couldn't be) identical in all respects. Judging by all the leaks, AMD’s Renoir desktop APUs should show up very soon. Intel's UHD 630 is back in the dumps, with the 3200G beating it by 175%, though it does manage a playable 31 fps—not silky smooth, but it should suffice in a pinch. That gives Razer (and Gen11 Graphics) a slight advantage that may account for some of the difference in performance, though the higher 25W TDP when using the performance profile appears to be the biggest factor based on our testing. A smart choice to make for budget gamers. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Processor Overview:Specification: ︎ CPU Cores: 4 ︎ Threads: 8 ︎ GPU Cores: 11 ︎ Base Clock: 3.7GHz ︎ Max Boost Clock: 4.2GHz ︎ Total L1 Cache: 384KB ︎ Total L2 Cache: 2MB ︎ Total L3 Cache: 4MB ︎ Unlocked: Yes ︎ CMOS: 12nm FinFET ︎ Package: AM4 ︎ PCI Express® Version: PCIe 3.0 x8 ︎ For the purposes of this review the Ryzen 5 3400G was in an AORUS X470 Ultra Gaming motherboard paired with 16GB of Corsair Vengeance DDR4 RAM overclocked to 2933 MHz. Fit with 11 Vega GPU cores, it's no stallion, but it will get by in many recent games if … AMD meanwhile gets a modest benefit from DX12, even on its integrated graphics, so Vega 11 is 'only' 38% slower than the GTX 1050, compared to the overall 43% deficit. The four cores and eight threads on the 3400G are very strong, and while there's not a massive leap forward from last year's 2400G, performance increases are still increases. It's an incredible value product with stunning performance, in particular from its integrated GPU. Did you guys check how your graphs look like? There was a gap of nearly 12 months where no new drivers were made available. Except the 1070 Ti actually runs at closer to 1.85 GHz, so basically 9,000 GFLOPS. Upgrade Solutions. So, the verdict. The Ryzen 5 3400G's $50 premium over the $99 Ryzen 3 3200G also gets you slightly higher clock speeds. At stock, they're clocked at 1400 MHz, but using Ryzen Master you can increase this manually, as well as balance the voltage. Framerates aren't consistent, however, with odd behavior on the different AMD APUs. Learn more. Sign up now to get the latest news, deals & more from Windows Central! The good news: Every game was able to run! Based on 744,273 user benchmarks for the AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) and the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. An unlocked CPU and GPU means you're free to tinker. We're using the same nine games (Borderlands 3, The Division 2, Far Cry 5, Final Fantasy XIV, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Strange Brigade), but we're running at 720p (no resolution scaling) and minimum fidelity settings. Integrated graphics tested: ubiquitous and oh-so-slow! However, a lot of changes are coming this year, sooner than later. Today, AMD released their new Ryzen G processors, which feature integrated graphics with the Vega architecture. Even if you don't plan on gaming much, it's still a great buy, and since it's on the AM4 platform you have a wide upgrade path. And if you save up for a graphics card, you've still got a strong CPU to add it to down the road. Zaměříme se také na herní výkon integrované Vegy 11, který je poměrně sluÅ¡ný. The Ryzen 5 3400G runs at a base clock of 3.7GHz, versus 3.6GHz for the Ryzen 3 … In short, there are ways to make integrated graphics faster and better, but they cost money. Update: We've added Intel's Gen11 Graphics using an Ice Lake Core i7-1065G7 processor. Meanwhile, AMD's RNDA 2 architecture is coming (and should eventually end up in an APU), and Intel's Tiger Lake with Xe Graphics should also arrive this summer. If you're wondering about even older Intel GPUs, the HD 4600 is roughly half as fast as UHD 630. Part of that is the higher TDP, but a bigger factor is that AMD's GPU architecture is simply superior. If you want to run modern games at modest settings like 1080p medium, none of these integrated graphics solutions will suffice—at least, not across all games. That's a huge bottleneck. Below are the full suite of benchmarks. I would like to receive mail from Future partners. But why would anyone want one of these? That knocks out HD 4600, but the remaining GPUs can all run it at acceptable levels—and even smooth levels of 60+ fps on the AMD APUs. Yup, it's a pretty big gap, helped by the faster desktop CPU as well (you can see that performance drops a bit with a Ryzen 5 3400G). The Division 2 performance shows the trend we'll see in a lot of the more demanding games. Even with 'overclocked' DDR4-3200 system memory running in a dual-channel configuration, traditional PC integrated graphics solutions share the resulting 51.2 GBps bandwidth with the CPU. New York, Here's how it performs in a mixture of games. For that matter, even the old Intel HD 4600 is somewhat playable at 27 fps. Then Intel finally passed the buck to AMD and said users should download AMD's drivers, and less than two months later, AMD removed Vega M from its list of drivers. The GPU cores while impressive, aren't a massive step up over last year's 2400G, neither are the CPU cores. Middle Earth: Shadow Of War ... RTX 2060 SUPER FE + Ryzen 5 3400G. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G – Zenové APU s grafikou Vega 11 PC TUNING / HREJ.CZ / TRYHARD / WOT / DOTA2 / GRUNEX PřihláÅ¡ení / Registrace / Zapomenuté heslo / RSS Intel is hoping to fix that with Xe Graphics, and Tiger Lake looks reasonably promising. They should make a 100-150watt TDP apu. Oh yeah, I personally have a Ryzen 5 2400g in my new gaming pc. The reason for that is mostly the memory bandwidth bottleneck. Not only does that make it a useful heart for a home office PC or even a media system, it's got plenty to offer for gaming as well. Where Intel puts integrated graphics on all of its mainstream processors, AMD has two different products, one with graphics and one without. Shop all the best Cyber Monday deals NOW. I ran that same test on 15W ICL-U and got just 10-13 fps, and 17-21 fps at 25W, with the caveat that we don't know the TDP of the Tiger Lake chip. AMD's processor lineup can be a little confusing if you're a newcomer to the space. AMD's tech specs claim that 2933 MHz is the maximum supported speed, so this is where I left it. For the sort of person who might want to buy one of these, it's absolutely worth the investment. We also wanted to look at synthetic graphics performance, as measured by 3DMark Fire Strike and Time Spy. In the meantime, PC integrated graphics solutions are going to remain a bottleneck, and even more memory bandwidth likely won't change things. And, as noted earlier, 3DMark scores can be kinder to Intel's GPUs than actual gaming tests. All of the AMD APUs manage a very playable 50 fps or more, with minimums above 30 fps. (Note: don't get the 'fake' China models, as they likely aren't using an actual GTX 1050 chip!) The 3400G CPU cores have been overclocked by 8% from 3.9 GHz to 4.2 GHz, while the Vega 11 graphics engine comes clocked at 1.4 GHz, a 12% boost from the … The 65W TDP may feel a little high considering the Ryzen 7 3700X has exactly the same stat, but that's to be expected from the older architecture. It shouldn’t be a factor for these gaming and graphics tests, though testing large games off the Razer's 256GB (minus the OS) storage was a pain in the rear. It's still playable at least, though not on Intel's UHD 630 where framerates are in the low-to-mid teens. This review sample handled an overclock of 4.05 GHz on the CPU cores on the stock Wraith Spire air cooler, which resulted in an impressive 1980 score in Cinebench R20, around half the score of my own Ryzen 7 2700X with twice the core count. Other current-generation Intel chips can further reduce performance by limiting clocks or disabling some of the GPU processing clusters—we didn't test anything with UHD 610, for example. Last, we have Strange Brigade, which, like RDR2, only supports the DX12 and Vulkan APIs. The main event of the Ryzen 5 3400G is its RX Vega 11 graphics. I've been pushing this thing pretty hard and almost without exception it has blown me away with its performance and value. Intel shocked a lot of us when it announced Kaby Lake G in 2018, which combined a 4-core/8-thread Kaby Lake (7th Gen) CPU with a custom AMD Vega M GPU, and tacked on 4GB of HBM2 for good measure. We benchmarked Intel's current desktop GPU (UHD Graphics 630) along with an older i7-4770K (HD Graphics 4600) and compared them with AMD's current competing desktop APUs (Vega 8 and Vega 11). We'll have to wait and conduct our own testing of Tiger Lake to see how Xe Graphics performs, but early indications are that it might not be too shabby. Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i3 9100F vs Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5 9400F از کانال آرین اول. Intel initially said it would "regularly" update the graphics drivers for the Vega M GPU, but that didn't actually happen. Spoiler alert: Intel's HD 4600 and older integrated graphics don't have DX12 or Vulkan drivers, which eliminated several games from our list. AMD sells the Ryzen 5 3400G for $150, but the only way to get the Core i7-8809G was either with an expensive NUC or an expensive laptop. The HD 4600 would also launch the game and run for maybe 10-15 seconds before locking up, but not at acceptable framerates—we've omitted it from the results because it couldn't complete the benchmark. Otherwise, performance is quite good on the AMD solutions, with the best result of the games we tested. AMD and Nvidia GPUs aren't the same, however, and Nvidia usually gets about 10% more effective performance per GFLOPS. It's possible to squeeze a little more, but further gains are minimal. But the biggest issue is that higher-performance integrated graphics is a limited market. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. The 3400G is a $150 APU and it's delivering 60 FPS or very close to 60 FPS experiences in a number of games that you would normally expect to need a dedicated GPU for. Meanwhile, the GTX 1050 has its largest lead over Vega 11, with 187 fps and 180% higher framerates. If you can get the 2400G cheap, which if you shop around you probably can, it's arguably the smarter choice. We've also added GTX 1050 results running on a Ryzen 5 3400G, which limits performance a bit at 720p and minimum quality. We intend to see if the games work at all, and what sort of performance you can expect. Both helped alleviate the need for lots of system memory bandwidth, but they of course cost extra. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. For desktop users, it will remain far easier to just buy a decent dedicated graphics card. You can also get a pretty solid uptick in performance from those 11 Vega GPU cores. Another alternative, which Intel already has tried, is various forms of dedicated GPU caching or dedicated VRAM. If you spend $150 on a regular Ryzen chip or anything from Intel, you will need a graphics card if you want to have any form of acceptable gaming experience. The motherboard is incredibly important and choosing the right one for your build can make the difference between a dud PC and glorious computing performance. We have not fully updated the text, as we'll have a separate article looking specifically at Gen11 Graphics performance. We equipped the AMD Ryzen platform with 2x8GB DDR4-3200 CL14 memory because our normal 2x16GB CL16 kit proved troublesome for some reason. It's not wrong as such, but it's important to not simply take such results at face value. We've also included performance from a budget dedicated GPU, the GTX 1050. AMD's Ryzen 3 3200G with Vega 8 Graphics is 2.3 times faster than Intel's Core i7-9700K and UHD Graphics 630. Simple: It has over twice the memory bandwidth. As a potentially interesting aside, initial leaks of Intel's future Rocket Lake CPUs, which may have Xe Graphics, surfaced recently. On one hand, if you play around with the in-game settings enough you'll find your own personal sweet spot of performance and graphical fidelity, but there are some issues you simply can't avoid. 87.67 1% Low. Visit our corporate site. Graphic card and processor will work great together on 2160p/4K resolution. The 3200G with Vega 8 notches up another big lead of 165% over UHD 630, while the GTX 1050 has another relatively close result with the dedicated GPU leading the 3400G and Vega 11 by only 45%. The chasm between Vega 8 and Intel's UHD Graphics 630 is even larger than the gap between Vega 11 and the GTX 1050. I've been impressed by AMD's Vega iGPUs on both the Athlon 200GE and the Ryzen 5 2500U for laptops, but the 3400G is something else. Wrong. No spam, we promise. Intel may still look at HBM2 or stacked chips to add dedicated RAM for future integrated GPUs, but we don't expect those to be desktop solutions. That's not the way the console world works, and when Sony or Microsoft are willing to foot the bill for custom silicon, impressive things can be done. The storage also varied based on what was available (and I didn't want to reuse the same drive, as that would entail wiping it between system tests). Three of those require either DX12 or Vulkan, while Metro Exodus supports DX11 and tried to run … but it kept locking up a few seconds into the benchmark. The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 … Xbox Series X will kick that number up to 52 CUs, again with the RDNA 2 architecture. In the past, 3DMark has been accused of being overly kind to Intel—or perhaps it's that Intel has put more effort into optimizing its drivers for 3DMark. The 3400G breaks 100 fps and even keeps minimums above 60, and the GTX 1050 is only 35% faster than the 3400G's Vega 11 Graphics. But integrated graphics should benefit from memory bandwidth up to and beyond 100 GBps. You could spend all day trying to understand minute details about it, but the truth is very simple. We're still working to get a Renoir processor (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) in for comparison, along with desktop Renoir when that launches. 693.29 3. But whether you want a budget gaming rig, a small-form factor PC or basically anything in between, the 3400G is a smart choice to make. Intel's latest Iris Plus solution in the 10th Gen Ice Lake processor does better, sort of. Mobile Coffee Lake for example is available with up to twice as many Execution Units (EUs) as desktop Coffee Lake, even though it generally ends up TDP limited. For the desktop, though, you're better off getting a dedicated CPU and a dedicated GPU, which you can then upgrade separately. The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and Intel Core i7-4790 microprocessors. In practice, the 3400G runs cool and quiet, and on my test bench throughout the course of this review it would idle anywhere between 30-35 C and under maximum load never exceeded 75C. First, Kaby Lake G was incredibly expensive for the level of performance it delivered. It's also of added importance with an APU like this because it uses 2GB of the system memory as VRAM for the integrated Vega GPU. Red Dead Redemption 2 is the most demanding game we tested, with performance of just 46 fps on the 3400G Vega 11, even at 720p and minimum quality. We'll have to wait and see what Rocket Lake actually brings to the table in late 2020 or early 2021. Borderlands 3 supports DX12 and DX11 rendering modes, with the latter performing better on the Intel and Nvidia GPUs. RTX 2060 SUPER FE + CORE I5 8400. A lot of that has to do with the game being far less demanding, especially at lower quality settings, and even Intel manages a playable 47 fps. We tested with the Vulkan API, and like Forza, HD 4600 can't even attempt to run the game. This clock speed was also stable at 1.3V, which helped reduce the maximum temperature to 66C, a 9C drop over the stock settings. Metro Exodus ends up being one of the better showings for Intel's UHD 630, as the 3200G is 'only' 88% faster. Even at minimum quality (other than resolution scaling), Intel's UHD 630 isn't really playable. AMD meanwhile averages more than 60 fps on the 3400G and comes close with the 3200G. ... Với lợi thế về xung nhịp GPU Vega và TDP cao hÆ¡n, các phiên bản Vega 11 và Vega 8 trên Ryzen 5 2400G và Ryzen 3 2200G đều cho điểm số vượt trội so với các biến thể di động. So why does the GTX 1050 end up performing 72% faster? PUBG at 1080p with a 75% render scale on low graphics settings yields FPS between 40-60 depending on the map and the situation. Clock speeds are up to 350 MHz higher than the 3400G, but it's now a Vega 8 GPU. Behold, the shortest lived Intel CPU of all time: Kaby Lake-G. That's an AMD RX Vega M with HBM2 memory on the left. Don't believe you need six or eight cores to game, four cores with eight threads is still plenty. Or, at least, they ran on current GPUs. Which isn't to say that 3DMark is the only testing needed. And before you ask, no, we didn't have a previous-gen AMD A10 (or earlier) APU for comparison. After all, if you're building a gaming PC, even a budget one, surely you want one of the best graphics cards, right? It's unfortunate that AMD's naming convention for its APUs somewhat clashes with that of the Ryzen CPUs on which they're based. Let's get cut straight to the heart of the matter. These new processors use the AM4 socket, which means all motherboards that support Ryzen will support Ryzen G, too. Compared to its current desktop graphics solutions, Intel has a lot of ground to make up. The timing of the 3400G coming to market is probably the biggest thing against it. Here are the best motherboards for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. In short, performance was decent, nearly matching an RX 570—which is significantly faster than anything we've included here. The Ryzen 5 3400G's $50 premium over the $99 Ryzen 3 3200G also gets you slightly higher clock speeds. Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips. And it only costs $150. In our testing, the largest lead was 22% (Forza Horizon 4), the smallest was 2% (Final Fantasy XIV), and on average, the difference was 12%. Shadow Of The Tomb Raider HIgh (DX12) Fluidez 94.10. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details without your permission. Why didn't you wait for Ryzen 4000 / Zen 3?! Time for more discounts! The GTX 1050 is by no means one of the fastest GPUs right now, though you can try picking up a used model off eBay for around $100. The combination of the Zen+ CPU and Vega GPU makes the Ryzen 5 3400G a brilliant buy for entry-level gaming builds, no graphics card required and … Specifically, the 99th percentile fps decreased as average fps increased. Because we're looking at multiple different integrated graphics solutions, our test hardware needed three different platforms. Boosting the TDP to 25W improves performance another 35%, however—55% faster than the desktop UHD 630, even though the desktop still has an additional 70W of TDP available. Okay, technically it's only 42% slower, but it did fail to run four of the nine games. In Fire Strike, the 1050 is 83% faster—slightly more favorable to the dedicated GPU. RTX 2060 SUPER FE + Ryzen 5 3600 ... 128.11 Average. Destiny 2's The Dawning event is here, and with it comes lots of new items available for Guardians to obtain. Starting with the big-picture overall view of gaming performance, you might be surprised to see the GTX 1050 basically doubling the performance of the fastest integrated graphics solution. Since the CPU and GPU cores are unlocked you can play around with both, and usually overclocking in the BIOS is the best way to go. The Time Spy result is only 14% higher than UHD 630, while Fire Strike is 30% faster. That's a hefty piece of extra performance for free. NY 10036. It would have been nice to see an APU based on Zen 2 and Navi, but presumably, we'll have to wait at least year for those. The combination of the Zen+ CPU and Vega GPU makes the Ryzen 5 3400G a brilliant buy for entry-level gaming builds, no graphics card required and you'll still have a good time. Information in this table was retrieved from actual processors using CPUID instruction, and we also utilized internal timer to measure CPU frequency. The older HD 4600 setup used the only compatible motherboard I still have around, and the only DDR3 kit as well—but both were previously high-end options. Shifting gears to Forza Horizon 4, we come to the first game that simply won't run on older Intel GPUs. The GPU benefits from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to … So why hasn't this happened? Based on 242,094 user benchmarks for the AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) and the Nvidia GTX 1050, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. Not too shabby at all. Some of these games are still relatively demanding, even at 720p, but all have been available for at least six months, which is plenty of time to fix any driver issues—assuming they could be fixed. We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Even the fastest Iris Plus Graphics still can't catch up to a desktop Ryzen 3 3200G and Vega 7 Graphics. Interestingly, a few games like Red Dead Redemption 2 close the gap as the shared system RAM helps. I made some calculations and checked some benchmarks and as far as I can see a G4560 + GTX 1050 has around the equal price of a Ryzen 5 2400G system. All of the AMD APUs manage a very playable 50 fps or more, with minimums above 30 fps. Like most the other non-X Ryzen CPUs the 1400 comes with a decent cooler included in the box (Wraith Stealth in this case). It's easy to turn your nose up at the sound of low settings or 720p resolution, but let's not lose sight of what we're dealing with here. At 1080p and medium settings, AMD's Vega 11 in the 3400G averaged 27 fps across the nine games, with only two games (Forza Horizon 4 and Strange Brigade) breaking the 30 fps mark—and Metro Exodus failed to hit 20 fps. There's nothing to turn your nose up at here, the performance is ridiculous. The Ryzen 5 3400G runs at a base clock of 3.7GHz, versus 3.6GHz for the Ryzen 3 … But ignoring outside factors and treating the 3400G for what it is, it's truly a fantastic thing, and one of my favorite PC products this year. Delivering GPU performance like you wouldn't imagine, And even though this is a budget chip, both the CPU and GPU cores are unlocked, allowing for a little tinkering to squeeze some extra performance from the 3400G. In our overall metric, the GTX 1050 was 72% faster than the 3400G Vega 11. First, it's not entirely correct to say that this hasn't happened in the PC space. AMD RYZEN 5 2400G 3.9GHz with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics PC We, at Evetech, pride ourselves at maintaining one of the best price to performance ratios in South Africa. But if you're OK with spending a few minutes tinkering you can bring that down quite a bit, and tinkering is something you should definitely do. The result is a quad-core processor with the best integrated graphics on a desktop chip right now. One run even had a score that was lower than the 3400G. Tripling the performance of UHD 630 would get Intel to competitive levels, which isn't actually out of the question. Cyberpunk 2077 is an absurdly ambitious game in many aspects, but its performance and graphics on consoles like the Xbox One and PS4 leave a lot to be desired. The current PS4 Pro and Xbox One X pack 36 CUs and 40 CUs, respectively. AMD Ryzen™ 5 3400G with Radeon™ RX Vega 11 makes the most powerful graphics on a desktop processor providing the power to play games. It shouldn't matter much, as none of the tests benefit from large amounts of RAM (preferring throughput instead), and the tighter timings may even give a very slight boost to performance. Earlier versions of Iris Pro Graphics included up to a 128MB eDRAM cache, and Kaby Lake G included a 4GB HBM2 stack. Intel just showed off TGL (TGL-U, maybe?) Time Spy required DX12, so again the HD 4600 can't run it, but the rest of the GPUs could. That's not really AMD's fault though. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G(Clock speed at 100%)withNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti(Clock speed at 100%) x1will produce only 1.21%of GPU bottleneck on 2160p/4Kresolution. With this round of testing out of the way—and a big part of why we wanted to do this was to prepare for the incoming Xe Graphics and AMD Renoir launches—inevitably, people wonder why the gulf between iGPU and dGPU (integrated and discrete GPUs) remains so large. No surprise: The AMD Ryzen 3400G is the current winner. In theory, Vega 11 should be 54% faster than Vega 8. Looking at the GTX 1050 GPU shows at least one point of contention. Take one look at the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X specs, and it's clearly possible to make something much faster. This is one of those cases where GPU memory bandwidth likely plays a bigger role, as all three AMD APUs cluster together at the 66-67 fps mark. Unfortunately, as the saying goes, the more things change…. In fact, the new R5 2400G (which features Radeon Vega 11 graphics) ... the Intel+Nvidia combo is the only solution out of these that is able to hold an average of over 60 FPS. Here's how to make the most of Cyberpunk 2077's visuals on consoles, Age of Empires 2: DE is getting an official expansion pack in January, Everything new in Destiny 2's The Dawning 2020 holiday event, Best AMD motherboards for the Ryzen 7 3700X, Astonishing integrated graphics performance, Previous gen 2400G pricing more attractive, F1 2019 - 1080p, medium settings - 62 FPS average, Rise of the Tomb Raider (DX12) - 720p, medium settings (no shadows) - 58 FPS average, Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 720p, low settings - 51 FPS average, Forza Horizon 4 - 1080p, low settings - 53 FPS average, Wolfenstein 2 - 720p, low settings - 60FPS lock, Dirt Rally - 1080p, high settings - 59.8 FPS average. The 1400 is a budget quad core, 8 threaded CPU with base/boost clocks of 3.2/3.4 GHz. DDR5-6400 will basically double the bandwidth of DDR4-3200 memory, but we won't see support for DDR5 in PCs until 2021. Final Fantasy XIV is the closest Intel comes to AMD's performance, trailing by just 28%. Additionally, a score of 3,682 was generated in 3DMark Fire Strike, with a graphics score of 4,142. Unfortunately, the motherboard in question isn't particularly useful in this area, but it's presented a good chance to see what you can achieve with the latest version of the AMD Ryzen Master software. And that's only when we're looking at AMD's current offerings. 11:12. In Fire Strike, the result was almost identical: Vega 11 leads by 170%. And it's definitely something you should do (more on that below.). We can see this in the performance difference between AMD's Vega 8 and Vega 11 Graphics in the above charts. And you should. Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, [Oct '19 ColdSpy] MORE DETAILS The PS5 will stick with 36 CUs, but they'll be AMD's new RDNA 2 architecture, which potentially boosts performance per watt by over 100% compared to the older GCN architecture. For this update, we also have results from Ice Lake's Gen11 Graphics, but that's only for mobile solutions, so it's in a different category. Second, and perhaps more critically, support was a joke. More importantly for consoles, they can integrate a bunch of high-performance memory—GDDR5 for the current stuff and GDDR6 for the upcoming consoles. I'm surprised that AMD doesn't sell a similiar apu to what they put into the Xbox or PS. Với mức điểm 9967 điểm thì RX Vega M GL mạnh hÆ¡n cả GTX 1050 Ti. Microsoft's upcoming Xbox Series X has a substantially faster GPU than anything shown here. Average framerates are lower, however, so even at minimum quality, you won't get 60 fps from any of the integrated graphics solutions we tested. They don't need to worry about users wanting to upgrade the RAM, which makes it possible to use higher performance GDDR5/GDDR6 memory. That's likely because AMD knows stuffing in more GPU cores without boosting memory bandwidth is mostly an exercise in futility. Ice Lake and Gen11 Graphics are already 55% faster than UHD Graphics when equipped with a 25W TDP, and Tiger Lake with Xe Graphics could potentially deliver 75% (or more) performance than Gen11. But taking the overall gaming performance we showed earlier, the 3400G Vega 11 was 168% faster than the 9700K UHD 630. There was a problem. When constrained to 15W TDP for the entire chip, it's only 15% faster than UHD 630.