By Jon Martindale December 2, 2020 AMD’s Ryzen 5000-series looks set to compete with Intel’s best CPUs like never before. For near future games, AMD is gonna school them. get 3700x or i5 10600k...nvenc only uses gpu so get better gpu like 2070super. Better to wait for AMD, Intel, and Nvidia to release their next gen parts later this year. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. The new top of the line from AMD has 12 processing cores and 24 threads, in addition to 3.7 GHz base clock and 4.8 GHz speed in turbo mode. Which is the point of NVENC. This is the place to ask! If you want the best gaming/ streaming performance just grab a 8c/16t intel cpu with high core clocks for most fps. Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. Intel’s 10th Gen Comet Lake-S desktop processors are going to be based on the tried and tested methodology of “increase the core clocks as much as you can, and hope for the best”. I assume you mean the i7-10700K not the i9-10900K. 10900k only really makes sense if you play CPU bottlenecked games like squad or star citizen. to improve performance due to the way the cache is laid out and other things I don't totally understand. Users that do a lot of rendering should investigate dedicated hardware encoders such as NVENC and Quick Sync as these are far more efficient than CPU based rendering. So the RYZEN is a clear winner here. Posted by 10 months ago. The 10900K substantially slower than the RYZEN 9 3950X here. I've been having some hot debates with friends on which processor I should go for, and even suggestions to wait for the next series of Ryzen to release, what do you guys think between these 3 options? The Core i9-10900K is the tip of Intel's spear in its newest 10th Generation Core ("Comet Lake-S") lineup of desktop CPUs.As a top-of-the-line 10-core processor (the estimated selling price is $488 for the bare chip), the Core i9-10900K posts great scores in gaming with our standard test GPU (even setting a record one title, Counter Strike: Global Offensive). Copied. I stopped counting after literally nine charts where the 10900K was ahead... New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Any modern operating system's scheduler will also keep loads on the same ccx (I think? Discussion . If you are getting the next gen GPU then stick with 10600k or up or maybe wait on the AMD Zen 3. Gaming performance now at parity or better with Intel Core i9 Record-setting content-creation results in its price bracket Compatible with Socket AM4 Low TDP compared to Intel's options 2020 has certainly been one amazing year for technology and gaming hardware releases. by | Nov 6, 2020. Whilst AMD’s competing $420 USD Ryzen 3900X and $675 USD Ryzen 3950X do have a greater number of cores, their lower clock speeds and higher memory latency handicap them in non-rendering use cases. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X VS Intel Core I9 10900K. 2080, yes i have a 2080ti and plan to stream with obs, The nvenc encoders on all the cards are the same. Intel's CPUs (i5, i7, i9, etc. The 3900x is a 12c/24t cpu. It allows smooth streaming even on machines using Nvidia cards paired with budget CPUs. 10900K has better single thread performance, but is usually outpaced by the 3900X and is far superior in terms of pricing and availability. 3900x vs 10700k reddit. Ull be good to go for next 4-5 years. Similarly, Intel flexes its muscles here with a 25% and 13% advantage. Intel vs. AMD Comparison: Core i9-10900K vs. Ryzen 9 3900X Speaking of bucks, no Intel chip-stack launch would be complete without our value comparison to AMD. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Error! Man... you want to know the facts? (10 Cores/20 Threads)Intel Core i7-10700K Stock. Intel’s flagship Comet Lake-S CPU goes against Ryzen 9 series. I leave headroom on the gpu so it never goes below the framecap. AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores and 24 threads. But the ryzen 9 will be about 5% slow and a bit cheaper. Discussion . /r/Intel is for enthusiasts to discuss Intel products and Intel's competition. In this review, we will take a deep look at how these two CPUs compare to one another, as well as how these hardware specs deliver in gaming and productivity performances. The Ryzen 9 5900X is the latest of the two. Reddit. So, I snagged the CPU out of his PC (with his permission, of course! Those who think u need 50 cores lowspeed amd for gaminng/streaming its just bullshit. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. ... Luckily, my roommate had an AMD PC with a 3900x inside, on an Aorus x570 pro wifi. (8 Cores/16 Threads)Intel Core i5-10600K Stock. You can even view which cores are the fastest per ccd and per ccx with the "Ryzen Master" program. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The 10900K is the best gaming CPU, not even a question. At 4k you are GPU limited, so unless you plan on getting an RTX3080 when it comes out then they are all the same. Im streaming with a 9900k. Build Help. Per thread costs based on street pricing in June 2019. Hello :) Im thinking about upgrading or rather replacing my current PC with something more modern. IDG. The 10900k is a 10c/20t Cpu. Nvenc uses only your gpu so your cpu won't be affected. It doesn't beat the 10900K in all the games there. An early review of the Core i9-10900K has been published ahead of the official embargo. 3900x is really for professionals or streamers. This also applies to 3900X vs 10700K, but with a lower threshold for the non-game CPU load. Archived. Welcome to the Ryzen 9 5900x vs Intel i9-10900K benchmark comparison. If you are doing significant multitasking with heavy background workloads, the 3900x is a better option. Users that do a lot of rendering should investigate dedicated hardware encoders such as NVENC and Quick Sync as these are far more efficient than CPU based rendering. AMD Ryzen 5900X vs. Intel Core i9 10900K: Revenge of the underdog? The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X.Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). level 2 Avant3 So if you want to go Intel for gaming, spending $100 or $200 more on those Core i7 and Core i9 parts won’t make sense. More cores typically translates into … Please help: i9-10900k vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950x + 2 more questions. If you care about absolute maximum fps then overclocked Intel is still the way to go. As for the benchmarks we're looking at Cinebench R20 results in single-core tests, where AMD's purported Ryzen 9 3900XT beats Intel's new Core i9-10900K… The CPU choice is borderline completely irrelevant if you're using NVENC. For CURRENT games, Intel is probably a little better. The only way a 3900X could beat a 10900K in gaming is if you run something in the background with very heavy CPU load while playing. 10700k vs 3900x Looking at upgrading my current PC and for what's in my price range the Ryzen is the one I wish to go with, but I also know the 10700k will be dropping shortly and I don't know if I should wait and see it's performance and price or not. As a note i dont use nvenc because i need my 2ghz 1080ti for the fix 141fps. 7 1 17. There was 35% difference, in terms of performance. Ryzen 9 3900X vs i9 10900k, which is preferable? The Core i9-10900K sat nearly equal to the Ryzen 9-3900X, which is an impressive feat given it has fewer cores and threads, but again, this is likely … Intel Core i9 10900K: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Percentage difference: Shadow of Tomb Raider. Ryzen actually uses the fastest cores for anything that needs single core performance as well. Users that do a lot of rendering should investigate dedicated hardware encoders such as NVENC and Quick Sync as these are far more efficient than CPU based rendering. Not even close actually. If you're going to use NEVNC, then the 10900K will give you more FPS. Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. My cpu isnt even ocd. ... That said, the 10700K certainly makes more sense than the 10900K, as it offers the same level of gaming performance for around $100 less. If you have the money, go Intel, why not. CINEBENCH R20 SINGLE. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. 3900X usually beats it though. Dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync … Antony Leather. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. Cookies help us deliver our Services. With x264 the ryzen one is the obvious choice. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. With x264 on “fast solely on cpu ( even rescaling from 1440p is running only on the cpu) , this while im gaming on fixed 141fps on 1440p competitively fps game and grab ur chair i never seen anything higher than 65%cpu usage. If you are mainly gaming with some lighter background loads or streaming, the 10900k will be the go-to … Anyone who says 10 cores isn't empty for streaming is a Muppet, especially since Intel has a pretty nifty trick of allocating the fastest cores to games. Intel Core i9-10900K Stock. The 10900K also requires a new (Z490) LGA1200 motherboard, which Intel has indicated will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The flagship, Core i9-10900K is the only chip that will feature a higher core count over the preceding Coffee Lake parts. I’ve also tested the Cinebench R20 in the single core performance, though the I9-10900K was 0.5% ahead over the 3950X. I'm trying to build a new PC with a 2080 (or even wait for the 30 series from Nvidia), what do you guys think? ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit … CINEBENCH R20 MULTI Today, the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X is $21 per thread. This also applies to 3900X vs 10700K, but with a lower threshold for the non-game CPU load. I've also been an Intel user for 4 years now with zero issues and wanted something new, so here is my unbiased opinion. A good example of the confusing nature of TDP numbers here. I would recommend a 3700x and spending more on the GPU for most people. Intel Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3950X. Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. Discussion. I would suggest a 3900X, or even a 3800X, if you want to go the Ryzen route. Press J to jump to the feed. Im think about buying 10th i9 or 3900x but idk what is better for only gaming but in 4k, In 4k almost any current gen cpu will have similar performance. With either cpu I would recomend x264 encoding to give the gpu more room to perform. The sample tested by TecLab appears to be a retail version, meaning there should be no reason to believe that the sample was cherry-picked by Intel. ... namely the Ryzen 7 3700X and the Ryzen 9 3900X. ), Storage (Intel 665p, Optane, etc. I've been having some hot debates with friends on which processor I should go for, and even suggestions to wait for the next series of Ryzen to release, what do you guys think between these 3 options? The only way a 3900X could beat a 10900K in gaming is if you run something in the background with very heavy CPU load while playing. The reddit post was itself a response to a video where a YouTuber claimed to be lowering temperatures and boosting performance on Ryzen 3000 CPUs by lowering the. ), Networking products, and all other Intel-related topics are discussed here. PC upgrade dilemma - R9 3900x vs i9-10900k. The Core i9 10900K from Intel comes equipped with 10 processing cores, 20 threads (threads) and speeds that are at 3.7 GHz and 5.3 GHz with the turbo driven. 2 direct from the cpu along with 4 pcie 4. I had about 10 days ago upgraded from my older i7-7700k to the AMD-3900X due to bottle-necking and future proofing. Intel Core i9 10900K: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Percentage difference: Power Draw. LinkedIn. Will the overheads of streaming softwares like OBS impact much on the cpu? However, … or ccd?) This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. Intel i9 10900k vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900x - Test so sánh render corona 3dsmax. The 5900X matched the 5950X exactly with 128 fps making it 6% slower than the 10900K, but still a good overall result given the double-digit percentage improvement over the 3900X. Hi, I don't see any benchmarks on this yet but if i were to go for a single gaming + streaming pc on NVENC encoder paired with 2080ti, would the 10900k technically come out on tops compared to the 3900x in fps? PC upgrade dilemma - R9 3900x vs i9-10900k. Regarding fps, if you play at 1080p, the intel one will be ahead. Copy Link. Email. Close. how much of an increase would they be, do you think? ), and put it into my PC. Earlier this week we reviewed Intel’s new Core i9-10900K and found that it was a strong performer, but it fell short of impressing in a world dominated by AMD's Ryzen lineup.